--- Log opened Tue Mar 13 00:00:12 2018
01:16 -!- Warcop [~josh@166.137.97.45] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
01:19 -!- Warcop [~josh@166.137.97.45] has joined #se2600
06:21 <@Dolemite> mr0ning, be0tches and h0ez!
06:27  * aestetix hugs Dolemite 
07:15 -!- LastChild [~RasPi@c-71-228-205-189.hsd1.tn.comcast.net] has quit [Read error: No route to host]
07:17 -!- LastChild [~RasPi@c-71-228-205-189.hsd1.tn.comcast.net] has joined #se2600
07:17 -!- mode/#se2600 [+o LastChild] by ChanServ
08:24 -!- Synx_hm [~Synx_hm@unaffiliated/synx-hm/x-1623004] has joined #se2600
08:25 < Synx_hm> morning peeps
08:27 <@Dolemite> mernin
08:30 < Synx_hm> what to do with myself today
08:34 < aestetix> Synx_hm: apply to be secretary of state
08:34 < aestetix> position just opened up
08:34 <@Dolemite> yeah, holy shit
08:34 < Synx_hm> ha i just saw that
08:34 < aestetix> although you should be aware of a few job hazards
08:36 <@Dolemite> Hrmm, just one day after Tillerson condemned Russia for using the nerve agent on the ex-spy in Salisbury
08:39 <@Dolemite> I predict that Trump will make Roy Moore his new Secretary of State, and Dave Ramsey his Economic Advisor.   LOL
08:39 <@Dolemite> Wait, no.   Not LOL.
08:39  * Dolemite cries uncontrollably
08:40 < aestetix> we all know he'll pick someone truly qualified
08:40 <@Corydon76> The Senate would never confirm Roy Moore to any post.  He'd have to be a recess appointment.
08:40 < aestetix> like Bill O'Reilly
08:45 <@Dolemite> Corydon76: With as much as Trump (through his people) have acknowledged that their goal is to disassemble the administrative state, I wouldn't be surprised if he leaves the State Department headless for a while
08:45 <@Corydon76> Mike Pompeo (CIA chief) has already been nominated as his replacement
08:46 <@Dolemite> He's been CIA director for barely a year
08:46 <@Dolemite> Ugh.   I want to go back to bed.
08:48 <@Corydon76> He was already running thin on potential nominees for positions, which may explain why so many positions have been left unfilled.
08:49 <@Corydon76> Should be even more difficult after November
08:49 <@Corydon76> If the Democrats flip the Senate, there will be no more ideological candidates for any post, include SCOTUS.
08:52 < aestetix> s/ideological//
08:53 <@Dolemite> Well the main thing that has shown in the past year is that Trump prizes loyalty over anything else - loyalty to HIM, not loyalty to the US.
08:53 < aestetix> if the democrats flip the senate, trump is basically gridlocked
08:53 <@Dolemite> So with as much as he has stabbed people in the back, there are few that would claim that loyalty
08:53 <@Corydon76> aestetix: The Democrats are not so mean-spirited as to block every possible candidate, as the GOP did against Obama
08:54 < aestetix> That remains to be seen.
08:54 < aestetix> I've lost a *lot* of respect for the democrats in the last two years.
08:55 < aestetix> And if you think they aren't of the same mold, I'll remind you that Pelosi would not allow impeachment onto the table in 2006.
08:55 <@Corydon76> Ah, yes, because you believe the Russian propaganda
08:55 < aestetix> yep, that's exactly why.
08:55 < aestetix> I'm actually a russian spy. Although a pretty bad one because I don't make any money off it
08:55 <@Corydon76> That's because Pelosi knew that impeachment was a political process
08:55 < aestetix> That's because Pelosi is just as in bed with the swamp as the GOP.
08:55 <@Corydon76> aestetix: I don't think you're a spy.  I think you were duped, like many Americans in 2016.
08:56 < aestetix> Duped?
08:56 < aestetix> How?
08:56 <@Corydon76> Let's start with what you think of Hillary.
08:56 < aestetix> I absolutely hate her.
08:56 <@Corydon76> Why?
08:56 < aestetix> Because of her voting record.
08:56 <@Corydon76> Such as?
08:57 < aestetix> Voted for the Iraq invasion, voted for the patriot act
08:57 < aestetix> And honestly I just don't trust her
08:57 <@Corydon76> You don't trust her?  Why not?  She's got years of experience.
08:58 <@Dolemite> Most of Congress voted for those same things
08:58 < aestetix> Dolemite: and Congress has one of the lowest approval ratings of all time.
08:58 < aestetix> Corydon76: now, it's easy to take this and assume that I'm a fan of Trump.
08:58 < aestetix> But that's not the case. I simply hate them all.
08:58 <@Corydon76> aestetix: Congress _always_ has a low approval rating.
08:58 < aestetix> Corydon76: ok, are you a fan of Hillary?
08:59 <@Corydon76> It's because people *love* their own representatives, but *hate* other people's representatives
08:59 <@Corydon76> aestetix: I think she would have made a good President, and I voted for her, despite having some faults.
08:59 < aestetix> Why?
08:59 <@Corydon76> Because she was the most qualified candidate
08:59 <@Evilpig> she wouldn't be antagonizing north korea for the first thing
08:59 < aestetix> Ok I can't argue with you there.
09:00 < aestetix> She was the worst candidate in the history of the US
09:00 <@Evilpig> she wouldn't be waiving her dick around in tariffs at china, etc
09:00 < aestetix> And I say that because I don't consider Trump a candidate
09:00 <@Corydon76> No, she wasn't.  We elected the worst candidate.
09:00 <@Evilpig> she would be a good little puppet 
09:01 <@Dolemite> aestetix: Congress as a whole has a low approval, but when people are asked about their specific Congresscritter, they seem to think better of them
09:01 <@Corydon76> Ted Cruz was also a terrible candidate in the primary
09:01 <@Dolemite> It's always everybody else that elects the idiots
09:01 < aestetix> Dolemite: that is reasonable, but I hate them all.
09:02 <@Corydon76> Electing someone with _zero_ track record in politics to the highest office in the land was simply irresponsible
09:02 < aestetix> I completely agree.
09:03 < aestetix> I think the US would have been better not electing anyone.
09:03 <@Corydon76> I don't agree with all of Hillary Clinton's policies, but at least she had a record, and she was fairly predictable
09:03 <@Dolemite> I still want a NULL Congress.   Kentucky had a candidate named Null many years ago.
09:03 <@Corydon76> That's not possible in our nation.
09:03 < aestetix> Belgium did that, they didn't have a president for 3 years
09:03 < aestetix> It looks like Italy might do that
09:04 <@Corydon76> We have ways of electing someone if the electoral college fails
09:04 <@Corydon76> It falls to the House of Representatives
09:04 <@Corydon76> And they are even free to select someone who wasn't even a candidate in the general election
09:05 < aestetix> Also, I completely distrust Hillary after what she did to Bernie.
09:05 < aestetix> And I hate Bernie too.
09:05 <@Corydon76> It's never happened, but we have a backup plan.
09:05 <@Corydon76> She didn't do anything to Bernie
09:05 <@Dolemite> Not directly, maybe
09:05 <@Dolemite> But her campaign controlled the DNC
09:05 <@Dolemite> No doubt about that one
09:05 <@Corydon76> The rules were set well in advance of either candidate declaring, and the DNC refused to change the rules to benefit Bernie.
09:06 <@Corydon76> And that's fair.  You don't change the rules because you don't like who's winning.
09:06 <@Corydon76> EVERY complaint about that comes down to the refusal to change the rules that were set in advance.
09:07 <@Corydon76> You set the rules up in advance PRECISELY to avoid a charge of favoritism.  Everybody knows the rules going in, and they can do their best to satisfy them.
09:07 < aestetix> Oh right, that's why they don't have superdelegates.
09:07 <@Corydon76> They set those up in advance.
09:08 <@Corydon76> Everybody knows the rules in advance.
09:08 <@Corydon76> And superdelegates have been a thing ever since 1968, when the Democratic delegates selected someone as a nominee who wasn't even on the ballot.
09:08 <@Corydon76> And he got trounced in the general.
09:09 <@Corydon76> Superdelegates were part of the process before Bernie got elected to his first public office ever.
09:10 <@Corydon76> So to say that it wasn't fair that they were part of the process means someone wasn't paying attention.
09:10 <@Corydon76> But even if you don't count the superdelegates, guess who still won.
09:10  * aestetix shrugs
09:11 < aestetix> I don't like her. I don't like any of them.
09:11 <@Corydon76> I mean, yeah, it might be a problem, if they overturned the regular delegates.  BUT THEY DIDN'T.
09:12 <@Mirage> I agree with aestetix.
09:12  * Mirage marks calendar
09:12 < aestetix> heh
09:13 <@Corydon76> I don't agree with some precepts of mathematical science.  But that doesn't mean I hate mathematicians.
09:13 <@Corydon76> Politics is a science, and politicians ignore the science at their peril.
09:14 <@Corydon76> Hating them because they follow rules that help them get elected is illogical
09:14 <@Mirage> politicians ignore whatever is conventient
09:14 < aestetix> I don't hate them because they follow rules.
09:15 < aestetix> I hate them because I have a sense of corruption from them. I don't sense I can trust any of them.
09:15 <@Corydon76> Mirage: only if they can.  Sometimes public opinion makes that impossible
09:15 < aestetix> I watched several of Hillary's campaign speeches. She seemed fake.
09:15 <@Corydon76> aestetix: that's because you're trying to trust the same things.
09:15 <@Corydon76> The wrong things
09:16 <@Corydon76> We don't elect politicians for their positions on known issues.  We elect them because their positions on known issues guide them on their decisions on unknown issues.
09:17 <@Corydon76> We cannot possibly anticipate every issue, and we cannot hold referendum votes everytime something hits the national attention.
09:17 < aestetix> Perhaps the correct answer is to stop focusing on the national level.
09:17 <@Corydon76> We elect them to have the good sense to decide for us, when response times matter.
09:19 < aestetix> And I do not believe Hillary has that good sense.
09:19 < aestetix> And I think time has demonstrated Trump doesn't have it either.
09:20 <@Corydon76> Oh, I believe Hillary has a great deal of good sense.  Having good sense doesn't mean I agree with her on every issue.
09:21 <@rhia> Corydon76, same
09:21 <@Corydon76> I also think John McCain, George W Bush, Romney, Gore, and Dukakis also had good sense.
09:21 <@rhia> aestetix, Hillary is no longer running for office, time to pick a new pinata
09:21 < aestetix> wait a second
09:22 < aestetix> rhia: you may have missed that Corydon76 is the one who began the inquisition and brought her up
09:22 < aestetix> And he didn't accept my initial answers and kept pushing.
09:22 <@rhia> and yet you couldn't resist picking up a stick and whacking away
09:23 < aestetix> Oh ok, so the next time someone asks me what I think of her, I'm supposed to just ignore them and walk away?
09:23 < aestetix> And you'll notice that I'm using the same stick to hit Trump.
09:23 <@Corydon76> You have a deep seated distrust of the woman, and I don't think that you've enunciated exactly why.
09:24 < aestetix> And I have a deep seated distrust of Trump as well, but you're not asking me about that because you agree with me.
09:24 < aestetix> And of, as I'll remind you I stated at the beginning, *everyone* in politics at the moment.
09:24 <@Corydon76> And we know that the Russians propagated a ton of disinformation during the 2016 election, which caused the same feelings in a great number of Americans.
09:24 < aestetix> Ok. So Russia made me hate every American politicna.
09:24 < aestetix> politician*
09:25 <@Corydon76> So I don't think it's outside of the realm of possibility that you were duped by Russian propaganda
09:25 <@rhia> Corydon76, I like Sanders, voted for Clinton when she got the nod because she was the only sane one on the ballot (and yes, I'm including candidates like Stein as well as Trump)
09:26 <@Corydon76> rhia: I had the same feelings.  I liked some of Sanders' policies, although by the time the Tennessee primary rolled around, I voted for Clinton
09:26 <@Corydon76> His pandering to a particular group of pseudoscience enthusiasts was terrifying to me.
09:28 <@rhia> that's one reason I don't want Oprah running - she foisted doctors Oz and Phil (plus other woo) on us
09:28 < aestetix> because Oprah is otherwise qualified :)
09:28 <@Corydon76> Agreed.
09:28 <@rhia> "Oh, she has star power!" yawn
09:28 <@Corydon76> aestetix: she was floated and supported by a large group of people who could have funded her campaign
09:28 <@Corydon76> That's why it's necessary to respond.
09:29 < aestetix> Now one valid criticism of my view is that I can't actually think of anyone in the US I *would* want as president.
09:29 <@rhia> aestetix, more so than Trump - at least she doesn't have a revolving door for bankruptcy court
09:29 <@Corydon76> I would want Dolemite as President.  I trust his judgement to make the right decisions.
09:29 < oddball> I actually would have considered voting for Bernie, because I knew that he understood how the politcal process worked.  I disagreed with him on damn near everything he stood for, but he's at least proven that he could play well with others.
09:29 < aestetix> Corydon76: ok, you got me. I would support Dolemite as president.
09:29 <@Dolemite> Corydon76: My first decision would be to run in the opposite direction.
09:30 <@rhia> Dolemite, see, you just proved them right
09:30 <@Dolemite> Dammit!
09:30 < oddball> As for Oprah, I just love the number of folks that slammed Trump as being nothing but a TV celeb (nevermind his *actual* background) that are now cheering the idea of Oprah.
09:31 <@Dolemite> Was it WC Fields that said, "I wouldn't want to be a member of any organization that would have me as a member"?
09:31 <@rhia> Groucho Marx
09:31 < aestetix> and Grouco Marx
09:31 <@Dolemite> danke
09:31 < oddball> You two beat me to it. :)
09:32 <@Corydon76> Douglas Adams also has a great quote for this.
09:32  * rhia <-- Marxist (as in Groucho, Harpo, Chico, Gummo, Zeppo)
09:32 < oddball> No one that wants the position should be allowed near it?
09:33 <@rhia> DA has great quotes for almost everything
09:33 < oddball> (or smoething like that.
09:33 <@Corydon76> Anybody who is capable of getting himself made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.
09:33 < oddball> )
09:33 < aestetix> Corydon76: again, agreed
09:33 < aestetix> rhia: that's the best kind of marxist
09:36 <@rhia> aestetix, yeah, but unfortunately US politics keeps nominating and electing Stooges
09:37 < aestetix> well this is why I keep pushing for people to focus at the local level
09:38 <@rhia> esp the ones with the support of the alt-right
09:38 <@rhia> then again, Europe is having it's own problems with their alt-right
09:38 < aestetix> oh boy is it
09:39 < aestetix> This is why being against something isn't enough.
09:39 < aestetix> You have to be for something.
09:40 < aestetix> so uh
09:40 < aestetix> Dolemite for president
09:40 -!- crashcartpro [uid29931@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-vousalovycbaffmr] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
09:40 < aestetix> btw, dunno if you all saw
09:41 < aestetix> but Trump got nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize
09:41 < Synx_hm> tell me you are joking
09:41 <@Corydon76> No, he didn't.
09:41 < aestetix> I didn't see it reported on any American media, but it was on the german media
09:41 <@rhia> twice, falsely
09:41 <@Corydon76> Yeah, someone faked the nomination, and it was confirmed as falsified.
09:41 < aestetix> wait wtf
09:41 < aestetix> really
09:41 <@rhia> and yes, it was on US media
09:42 <@rhia> but, since it was ACTUALLY fake news, they didn't play it 24/7
09:42 <@Corydon76> The people who are qualified to cast nominations are secret for a reason.
09:42 < aestetix> http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/donald-trump-fuer-friedensnobelpreis-nominiert-a-1190927.html
09:42 < PigBot> Donald Trump für Friedensnobelpreis vorgeschlagen - SPIEGEL ONLINE (at www.spiegel.de) http://tinyurl.com/ya23fc94
09:42 < aestetix> Wow, how the hell did that make it into Der Spiegel then
09:42 < aestetix> that's kind of a big oversight
09:43 <@Corydon76> Perhaps someone at Der Spiegel figured out how to fake a nomination
09:43 <@Mirage> complete tangent:  I can't fathom how something as simple as "for service in `chkconfig --list | grep 3:on | grep ^pe | awk {'print $1'}`;do service $service restart;done" is like some kind of voodoo magic to most of the other Liux guys we have working for us.
09:44 < oddball> One person submitted him as a possible nomination.  The comitee laughed at it, threw it away, and carried on.
09:44 < oddball> Apparently, anyone can submit names.
09:44 -!- mode/#se2600 [+o oddball] by ChanServ
09:44 < aestetix> well this explains why I didn't see it on american media
09:44 < aestetix> I just thought they were embarassed
09:46 <@oddball> Well, that would be a fair assumption.  A good portion of American mass media really hates to say anything good about the guy.
09:47 <@rhia> "if you can't say something nice, don't say anything"
09:47 <@rhia> what is there good to say about him?
09:50 <@oddball> Not much, but when you're running a story about how his bald on repeat, you've got issues.
09:51 <@rhia> eh, the news I *watch* is the local news - all the rest I read
09:51 <@rhia> don't know what obsesses the talking heads, don't care
09:53 <@oddball> And then there's the multiple times they've been caught either passing shit off without fact checking, or actively making shit up/editing tapes to say bad things about him...  Really?  He doesn't actually do enough bad shit?  You have to make shit up?
09:56 <@rhia> one of the (numerous) problems with televised news is their obsession with "first post!!!!!111!!" - doesn't leave time for taking 2 minutes to fact check
09:59 <@rhia> another news show might get the story on air 2 minutes before they do! their ratings might drop .5!
09:59 <@rhia> news should NOT be about ratings or commercials/ profit
10:04 <@rhia> Tillerson dared say something negative about Russia and now he's out. Gee, who could have imagined that? (anyone/everyone)
10:07 < aestetix> question... what do you all think of Stephen Colbert?
10:07 <@Mirage> in what rgard?
10:07 < aestetix> Are you a fan?
10:07 <@rhia> he's a comedian with more political savvy than most
10:07 <@rhia> haven't seen his show but once since leaving CC
10:07 < aestetix> rhia: I'd also argue he's twice as smart as the rest of the show hosts put together
10:08 <@Evilpig> rhia: he's a comedian with a writing staff that has more political savvy than most
10:08 <@Mirage> He's probably another one like Rush L who are really good at picking shit apart from outside the system, but would probably suck at the job themselves.
10:08 <@rhia> Evilpig, could be, but don't underestimate him
10:09 <@Evilpig> I'm not but the staff there cannot be underestimated.  the number of web campaigns and things they've come up with just can't be the work of a single mind
10:09 <@rhia> plus, he's basically memorized the LOtR and the Silmarillion
10:09 < aestetix> well he has two up on me then
10:09 < aestetix> since I haven't even read either
10:10 <@rhia> aestetix, 4 (trilogy+history)
10:10 <@rhia> Evilpig, yeah, definitely a collaborative effort
10:10 < aestetix> that's fair
10:11 < aestetix> I'm more referring to his on the fly responses during interviews
10:11 <@rhia> isn't it amazing what collaboration instead of constant competition can accomplish?
10:11 < aestetix> it's clear that he is really smart
10:11 < aestetix> rhia: both have a place
10:11 <@rhia> hence "constant" qualifier
10:11 < aestetix> oh ok
10:11 < aestetix> then sure
10:18 <@Evilpig> this time change shit really needs to go.
10:18 <@rhia> yes, yes it does
10:18 <@Evilpig> I was reading some news piece yesterday or the day before stating that half of the country doesn't give a crap about the time change and that made me think their poll was off or i'm in a hell of a bubble of people that hate the stpid change
10:19 <@rhia> Evilpig, half the US probably can't read analog clocks, so . . .
10:24 <@_NSAKEY> Evilpig: I'm in the half that doesn't give a shit. I got a little extra sleep this weekend. The last couple of years, PhreakNIC has occured during the time change, and I just stay up all night on the last night anyways.
10:44 <@Evilpig> I just see it as a pointless process that should be eliminated
10:45 <@Evilpig> drop the confusion around what time it is in arizona. when the rest of the states around them are changing time
10:47 <@Corydon76> Might also be better simply to standardize on a single time across the country and then adjust local business times appropriately.
10:48 < aestetix> mine doesn't happen until the 25th
10:48 <@Corydon76> So when I'm doing a scheduled phone call with another business, I don't have to ask "What time zone are you in, again?" and then try to make adjustments
10:50 <@Corydon76> "Oh, it's at 1800 Zulu?  Great, that time works for me!"
10:50 <@Corydon76> AM/PM can go away, too
10:51 <@Corydon76> Especially the nonsense that made 12 pm noon and 12 am midnight, when the preceding hour has the opposite notation.
10:52 < Synx_hm> 24hour time is so much more clear i do all my work meeting coordinating in 24 hour time
10:52 < Synx_hm> honestly for anything other than local meetings UTC makes quite a lot of sense
10:53 <@_NSAKEY> I force all of my computer clocks to 24 hour time. AM/PM is so stupid.
10:53 < Synx_hm> agreed
10:53 <@_NSAKEY> Synx_hm: Shortwave stations give out schedules in UTC. It's so nice.
10:54 <@Corydon76> Synx_hm: The problem with going for a different zone with local events is that you still have to make the adjustment in your head.  NO.  One time zone for everywhere, and business can adjust their opening and closing hours as appropriate.
10:54 <@Corydon76> It's not like businesses have consistency in opening and closing times anyway.
10:55 <@_NSAKEY> At my old job, they put up these analog clocks in the NOC room for the time zones in the US as well as the overseas time zones for the overseas offices.
10:55 <@_NSAKEY> I was just like, "This is insulting. I can do math. Give me the UTC offset and leave me alone."
10:56 <@_NSAKEY> But the clocks were solely put there to "look good" during C-level visits. After the first such visit, the batteries were removed and weren't replaced until the next C-level visit. We all bitched about the ticking so much that they replaced them with silent clocks just before I left.
10:56 < Synx_hm> haha
10:56 <@_NSAKEY> I actually asked if I could decommission the old clocks with a hammer.
10:57 <@Evilpig> Corydon76: i'm onboard with that but let's start small and just get rid of magically changing the clocks by an hour twice a year
10:57 <@Corydon76> _NSAKEY: not violent enough.  You need a shotgun with explosive rounds.
10:59 <@_NSAKEY> I'm pretty sure the Franklin police department would have had several issues with that.
10:59 <@_NSAKEY> Those clocks weren't worth the gas it would have taken to drive them to a place where that wouldn't be an issue.
11:02 <@Corydon76> You can't shoot them from the roof of the data center?
11:02 <@Corydon76> By them, I clearly mean the clocks, not the police officers.
11:03 <@_NSAKEY> LOL
11:03 <@_NSAKEY> Nice clarification.
11:04 <@_NSAKEY> We were in the same building as the server room.
11:04 <@_NSAKEY> Plus, it wouldn't have been much of a drop.
11:04 <@_NSAKEY> Just better to use a hammer and maybe a 5 in 1 to decomm them.
11:07 <@Corydon76> Oh, lordy.  Kroger is going to be the death of me.  They have pies for $3.14 tomorrow.
11:08 < Synx_hm> haha
11:08 < Synx_hm> better get your 'ive been krogering' sticker while you are there tomorrow
11:08 <@Corydon76> I've already spent $200 there this month
11:08 < Synx_hm> you using fuel points?
11:09 <@Corydon76> I was going to get a prescription there, but Aetna doesn't cover it, so it's $70.99 for a 90 day supply.  Meanwhile, I can get a 42-day supply 20 paces away for $10.
11:09 < Synx_hm> sucks
11:09 < Synx_hm> ive been looking into costco or kroger for my scripts
11:10 <@Corydon76> And they had a sale for that drug, with a coupon that is $3 off, which can be used 5 times.  So... I now have a 210-day supply of it.
12:15 <@ezelkow1> lol, tryin to poke my coworker to get him to push for his academy award
12:15 <@ezelkow1> we got notified in slack today that apparently dreamworks had been using some tool he opensourced, and they used it in conjunction with other stuff to win 2 academy awards this year for sci-tech
12:52 <@shapr> which tool?
12:53 <@shapr> Corydon76: I've seen that same thing with various prescriptions
12:53 <@shapr> cvs vs somebody, 300% price difference
13:15 <@ezelkow1> https://github.com/Comcast/weasel
13:15 < PigBot> GitHub - Comcast/weasel: Lightweight license checker. (at github.com) http://tinyurl.com/y7y7lau
13:22 -!- K`Tetch [~no@24-178-141-147.dhcp.thtn.ga.charter.com] has joined #se2600
13:22 -!- K`Tetch [~no@24-178-141-147.dhcp.thtn.ga.charter.com] has quit [Changing host]
13:22 -!- K`Tetch [~no@unaffiliated/ktetch] has joined #se2600
13:24 -!- K`Tetch_ [~no@24-178-141-147.dhcp.thtn.ga.charter.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
13:30 <@Mirage> Dagmar: I'm having a fun argument that you've had before regarding the _need_ to lower the TTL for CNAME entries prior to a scheduled change.
--- Log closed Tue Mar 13 13:37:05 2018
--- Log opened Tue Mar 13 14:29:54 2018
14:29 -!- Evilpig [~wilpig@96-80-184-99-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has joined #se2600
14:29 -!- Irssi: #se2600: Total of 36 nicks [16 ops, 0 halfops, 0 voices, 20 normal]
14:29 -!- mode/#se2600 [+o Evilpig] by ChanServ
14:29 -!- Irssi: Join to #se2600 was synced in 9 secs
14:41 -!- PigBot [~PigBot@wilpig.org] has joined #se2600
15:34 -!- crashcartpro [uid29931@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-lcgbwdqijlykuyoq] has joined #se2600
16:21 -!- Synx_hm [~Synx_hm@unaffiliated/synx-hm/x-1623004] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
16:47 < TheDukh> Anyone have any experience with ethereum development?
17:14 -!- sicsscam_ [~sicsscam@24.154.71.208] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
20:01 <@Evilpig> negative
20:41 < dasunt> only owed $300 this year for federal.
20:43 < dasunt> debating if I want to withhold another $15/paycheck to prevent that.
20:46 <@Evilpig> I owe over $1000
21:03 < dasunt> that hapened last year.  :(
23:38 < K`Tetch> shit, hawking dead
23:44 -!- NotLarry [~NotLarry@c-68-53-123-92.hsd1.tn.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
--- Log closed Wed Mar 14 00:00:14 2018