--- Log opened Fri Aug 11 00:00:26 2017
01:05 <@_NSAKEY> You guys reminded me of one of my "favorite" comcast experiences, from the days when they were messing up the DOCSIS 3 rollout. I was informed that "Linux is not a supported operating system," and the tech tried telling me to install Windows and come back. I don't remember everything I said, but I opened with "No, fuck you. This has nothing to do with Linux." I then explained the utter stupidity of his
01:06 <@_NSAKEY> statement, because of simple things like consumer routers not being capable of running Windows. I don't think I could get a modern day comcast support drone to understand something like that.
04:26 < aestetix> https://kek.gg/i/3hqgPJ.png
04:44 <@_NSAKEY> How is "No" violent?
04:44 <@_NSAKEY> I'm feeling triggered just for reading the request that lead up to the no.
04:56 < aestetix> you wanna be triggered?
04:56 < aestetix> http://bloody-disgusting.com/movie/3452558/schwarzenegger-confirms-return-terminator-franchise/
04:56 < aestetix> there
06:21 <@Dolemite> mr0ning, be0tches and h0ez!
06:55  * aestetix hugs Dolemite 
06:56 -!- crashcartpro [uid29931@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-mhzajkabwdvifoqv] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
06:57 <@Catonic> _NSAKEY: sir, I'm going to have to ask you to cage your anger and use words longer or shorter than four letters.
06:57 <@Catonic> _NSAKEY: Now, is the INTERNET led on the modem flashing green or red?
06:59 <@Catonic> the state of customer service is utterly hideous. "You have three options, choose one." "None of those fit this circumstance." "Bet you $100 one of them does and you're being difficult." "Ok, I take you up on that." "It's $100 if we find nothing wrong."
07:00 <@Catonic> ... five hours later: "Oh yeah, your cable is busted in five places. Man, y'all get a lot of lightning up here?" "See that dead tree? It was living five years ago."
07:03 <@_NSAKEY> Heh. I think these companies are wanting people to use the phone tree or some other way to solve their problems, and are using intentionally awful "support" to drive us there.
07:04 <@_NSAKEY> I still think Mona Shaw was right.
07:21 -!- mog [~mog@fsf/member/mog] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
07:22 -!- opticron [~opticron@75.76.59.35] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
07:25 -!- mog [~mog@fsf/member/mog] has joined #se2600
07:25 -!- mode/#se2600 [+o mog] by ChanServ
07:30 -!- opticron [~opticron@75.76.59.35] has joined #se2600
07:30 -!- mode/#se2600 [+o opticron] by ChanServ
--- Log opened Fri Aug 11 08:17:31 2017
08:17 -!- Evilpig [~wilpig@96-80-184-99-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has joined #se2600
08:17 -!- Irssi: #se2600: Total of 38 nicks [18 ops, 0 halfops, 0 voices, 20 normal]
08:17 -!- mode/#se2600 [+o Evilpig] by ChanServ
08:17 -!- Irssi: Join to #se2600 was synced in 8 secs
--- Log closed Fri Aug 11 08:17:34 2017
--- Log opened Fri Aug 11 08:17:40 2017
08:17 -!- Evilpig [~wilpig@96-80-184-99-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has joined #se2600
08:17 -!- Irssi: #se2600: Total of 38 nicks [18 ops, 0 halfops, 0 voices, 20 normal]
08:17 -!- mode/#se2600 [+o Evilpig] by ChanServ
08:17 -!- Irssi: Join to #se2600 was synced in 11 secs
08:38 -!- crashcartpro [uid29931@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-totwmrmwgfhmdezq] has joined #se2600
09:28 < dasunt> Article 25?
10:03 -!- TheDukh [~thedukh@cpe-74-141-205-192.kya.res.rr.com] has joined #se2600
10:52 < Synx_hm> im on whatsapp as of right now
10:52 < Synx_hm> i feel so cool and with the times
10:52 <@Corydon76> I thought Snapchat was where it's at.
10:52 < Synx_hm> the lack of spellcheck in the windows app is going to make me go back to hangouts though
10:53 < Synx_hm> wtf is snapchat?
10:53 < Synx_hm> ;)
10:54 <@Corydon76> I forget what app my husband installed the other day, but there were tons of complaints online about it spamming your addressbook.
10:54 < Synx_hm> i have a horrid feeling i just did that with whatsapp
10:54 < Synx_hm> it said something about accessing my contacts while i was fiddling about not paying attention
10:54 < Synx_hm> like that one fucking time i some how accidentally gave linkedin access to my gmail contacts
10:54 < Synx_hm> sweet christ, fuck you linkedin
10:56 <@Evilpig> stupid users.
10:57 <@Evilpig> change their domain password and their network mount stopped working so they sent us an incident complaining that it was broken
10:59 < Drag0n`> were sorry, we had to take the share down till the IPoCP packets updating your pasword information reached its destination, them avian carrier protocols can be slow
10:59 < Synx_hm> lol IPoCP thats great, im going to barrow that
11:00 < Synx_hm> Corydon76, odd question, does the phrase SIP Trunk upset you as much as it upsets me?
11:00 < Drag0n`> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1149
11:00 < PigBot> Title: RFC 1149 - Standard for the transmission of IP datagrams on avian carriers (at tools.ietf.org) http://tinyurl.com/6u8jfx6
11:00 <@Corydon76> Nope
11:01 < Synx_hm> it bugs the piss out of me, fucking vendors refuse to adopt packet lexicon instead of old TDM jargon
11:01 <@Corydon76> The point of the terminology is to parallel traditional telephony, to make it more easily understandable
11:01 < Synx_hm> Drag0n`, that is fucking amazing
11:01 < Synx_hm> sure, but it conflates the actual technology
11:02 < Drag0n`> https://www.cs.hmc.edu/~awooster/joke_rfcs.html
11:02 < PigBot> Title: April Fool's RFC's (at www.cs.hmc.edu) http://tinyurl.com/hb63mmc
11:02 <@Corydon76> Yeah, but the problem is that you're confusing exactness with communication
11:03 <@Corydon76> I used to be very pedantic, but pedantry sometimes gets in the way of actually communicating
11:03 < Synx_hm> valid
11:03 < Synx_hm> i accept peoples use of it, it just bugs me, i should find other things more important to get pissy about though i think is the point you are making
11:04 < Synx_hm> thanks Drag0n` im going to start dropping references to those RFCs in my communication some of the people i loath, see if they pick up on it
11:04 <@Corydon76> The details are best left to when you're troubleshooting a problem, not when you're talking about bird's eye view of setting up new customers
11:07 < Synx_hm> i usually do something like this, after weeks of conf calls on big picture ill have a one on one with an CM integrator, while i am working a config in screen share but we are just idle on phone call ill drop a 'oh btw SIP Trunk is a rather comical misnomer... blah blah too bad the big vendors and carriers are not smart enough to understand the nuances of packet vs circuit switching'
11:07 < Drag0n`> the funny thing is, theres a lug in germany that implemented the avian carrier protocol
11:08 <@Corydon76> What's your preferred terminology to use when referring to SIP trunks?  Channel really only applies when the pathway is open
11:08 < Drag0n`> https://dcloud-cms.cisco.com/demo_news/15434
11:08 < PigBot> Title: IP over Avian Carriers (IPoAC) v1 | News | Cisco dCloud (at dcloud-cms.cisco.com) http://tinyurl.com/kzjef36
11:08 < Drag0n`> hehe, even cisco gets involved
11:09 <@Corydon76> Because as long as you don't confuse, you can use your preferred terminology in response and hope the vendors catch on.
11:09 < Synx_hm> Corydon76, endpoint i guess but id rather just call SIP... SIP
11:09 <@Corydon76> I think endpoint is more confusing than trunk
11:10 < Drag0n`> http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/
11:10 < PigBot> Title: RFC-1149 | BLUG (at www.blug.linux.no) http://tinyurl.com/4ldf7
11:10 < Drag0n`> sorry, was norway
11:10 < Synx_hm> if you send me eleventy SIP INVITES all addressed to the same URI then so be it i'll happily configure eleventy endpoints all with the same contact URI to answer those inbound packets
11:10 < Synx_hm> trunk conflates size
11:10 <@Corydon76> When I say trunk, I think of my local configuration to reach the remote endpoint
11:11 <@Corydon76> And when you say trunk, implicit within the meaning is the capacity of the pipe to handle those endpoints simultaneously
11:11 < Synx_hm> not always, i work with quite a large number of avaya people, they think trunk and then go stupid on how many members it can have
11:12 < Synx_hm> they just assume its a trunk its of predetermined size and they dont need to be bothered with what that size is
11:12 < Synx_hm> never mind i have to configure x number of SIP members to terminate those calls
11:12 <@Corydon76> Heh
11:13 < Synx_hm> but trunk as a term on its own does have a nice use to imply grouping of signaling traffic to a common destination so i see your point
11:14 < Synx_hm> all of this always starts with avaya or avaya people, god i loathe avaya
11:17 < Synx_hm> Sir, i believe RFC5984 solves your desire to use TCP for SIP
11:17 < Synx_hm> my god i so so want to send this asshat an email with this
11:17 <@Corydon76> Until Avaya is no longer the prevalent telephone switching equipment provider, that's unlikely to change
11:22 < Drag0n`> lol
11:23 < Drag0n`> ask him if his SIP implementation is setting the packet security flag?
11:23 <@Corydon76> Drag0n`: you mean the Evil Bit?
11:23 < Drag0n`> yep
11:27 < Synx_hm> ha
11:27 < Synx_hm> Corydon76, how is it that Avaya and file chapter 11 projections, unload massive amounts of debt and be allowed to continue making profit
11:27 < Synx_hm> protections
11:28 < Drag0n`> thats the definition of chapter 11, its chapter 7 that leads to disolusion
11:28 <@Corydon76> American business.  If at first you cannot get your bank to refinance, fille Chapter 11 and force them into your repayment plan.
11:29 < Synx_hm> who assumes the responsibility of the debt, when its a corporation doing it
11:29 < Drag0n`> but that only works for large entities, smaller ones are told, "tough cookies, get bought"
11:29 <@Corydon76> A corporation is legally a person, so the entity is responsible for the debt
11:29 < Synx_hm> i can see individual citizens using the protection but it just seems filthy to let greedy corporations to do it
11:30 < Synx_hm> here americans, why dont you pickup all this debt we dont want anymore while we restructure to continue to make fortunes for our board
11:31 < Drag0n`> if corporations are people, wheres the long form birth certificate?
11:32 < Drag0n`> and would that mean mergers are marriages of polygamist entities, and acquisitions would be slavery?
11:33 <@Corydon76> Debt isn't thrown off to others; it's merely refinanced and/or charged off
11:33 < Drag0n`> the real question comes, just how do you put a corporate entity in jail, or put them to death?
11:33 < Synx_hm> so somebody takes a loss on what would have otherwise been paid for interest etc
11:34 <@Corydon76> Synx_hm: a forced loss, yes
11:34 < Drag0n`> if its charged off, someone still has to pay for it, the lost profit of the bank gets distributed down to the masses through lower intrest and higher fees
11:34 < Synx_hm> and that loss translates to the burden of the people, if banks continually have to eat up repos, forclosures, business debt, that trickles down to my checking account at some point
11:34 < Synx_hm> or the next time i need a loan
11:34 <@Corydon76> In Chapter 11, though, the debtees are afforded a seat at the table, and a judge ultimately decides
11:35 < Synx_hm> so in a way im paying off avaya's debt for them while they get rich
11:35 <@Corydon76> If the debtees do not allow a charge-off, the judge may convert the Chapter 11 into a Chapter 7, where the debtees are normally paid pennies on the dollar
11:36 <@Corydon76> It's usually in everyone's interest to keep the business afloat
11:37 < Synx_hm> ill have to go back and re-read Avayas PR on the chapter 11 filing, but i swear the context was 'hey dont worry we are still a massivly profitible business, we just didn't want to pay these specific debts anymore, look we are even more profitable now, yay us'
11:38 < Synx_hm> i do that and good luck getting loan, a job, a car, they do that and get to make more money
11:38 < Drag0n`> the only people that win in a chapter 7 situation are the people that have the money to swoop in and buy up the ip and asets for pennies on the dollar
11:39 < Drag0n`> chapter 11 is usualy invoked to get out of bad financial contracts
11:40 <@Corydon76> Drag0n`: and sometimes, that's the owners of the business itself, who previous to the filing of Chapter 7, gave themselves some pretty big bonuses
11:40 < Synx_hm> i think today ive learned that i hate all the things
11:41 <@Corydon76> If a bankruptcy judge sees it, he may try to claw back the bonuses, though
11:41 < Drag0n`> "were contractually obligated to pay these pensions and dont want to be hassled with the process or the money. lets file chapter 11"
11:42 < Drag0n`> thank the republicans for changing the bankruptcy laws to protect their investments
11:42 < Synx_hm> "we made promises that we no longer feel like keeping, if we sherp these promises we can make oddles more money. lets file chapter 11" - Avaya, probably
11:42 < Synx_hm> also now that i think about it
11:43 < Synx_hm> i dont get to keep my house if i stop paying my mortgage
11:43 < Synx_hm> is there some physical thing Avaya looses in this?
11:43 <@Corydon76> While that's a cynic's view, the more likely scenario is that those loans will probably force the business into Chapter 7, if they don't get a handle on them sooner
11:43 <@Corydon76> Synx_hm: a mortgage is a secured loan, though
11:43 < Synx_hm> Corydon76, ahh that was the view i was missing, indeed in that light it does make much more sense
11:44 <@Corydon76> In most cases, business loans are secured by anything.
11:44 <@Corydon76> aren't
11:44 < Drag0n`> yeah, theres the whole stigma and taint to the companies stock value of having a chapter 11 in their history
11:45 < Drag0n`> technicaly, most are secured by asset or IP value, thats why the creditors get a first seat in the chaper 7 vulture show
11:46 < Drag0n`> some are held by shares or percentage ownership
11:46 < Synx_hm> i believe avaya filed in jan... looks like from jan 4 to jan 23 their stock fell from $493 to $470, since then its been on a nice uptick 517 today
11:47 < Drag0n`> but wait till avaya needs to secure more funding and the banks know of the chapter 11
11:47 < Synx_hm> true
11:47 < Drag0n`> someone's going to need kneepads
11:47 < Synx_hm> hold up a sec
11:48 < Synx_hm> lol ive been tracking the wrong stock, Aviva hahaha
11:49 < Synx_hm> is avaya not publically traded?
11:50 < Synx_hm> anyways off to other things
11:51 < Synx_hm> anybody been on one of these NWS tours?
11:51 < Drag0n`> it may be a subsidiary of another holding corp
11:51 <@Catonic> SIP, SWALLOW, and GETLIT
11:51 < Drag0n`> avaya stock ticker is AV
11:51 < Synx_hm> taking the 4 year old to NWS nashville today for a 1 hour tour and baloon launch
12:04 < Synx_hm> ok in other news i think i need an employment lawyer
12:04 < Synx_hm> my company is constantly last min offering customers my weekends, like right now at noon on friday im told on hey btw we expect you to work both saturday and sunday with customer x
12:15 <@Catonic> nice!
12:16 <@Catonic> also not nice.
12:16 <@Catonic> but I kinda got that news myself.
12:16 -!- sync350 [~sync@c-73-237-89-90.hsd1.ga.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
12:16 < Synx_hm> if i made overtime i might be more inclined to help them but there is no monetary benefit to me slaving away at all hours of the week and weekend for this company
12:17 < Synx_hm> nor is there any clause in my contract that i am to be oncall all fucking weekend long for their piss poor planning
12:18 < Synx_hm> though my contract makes no mention of hours at all so perhaps that means so long as i am willing to accept a pay check they get to own all the hours of all the days until such a time as i quit or get fired
12:18 < Synx_hm> yay employment at will
12:18 <@Corydon76> Pretty much that.
12:19 <@Corydon76> Too bad the Obama rule on overtime wasn't allowed to take effect
12:19 < Synx_hm> im trying (all be it half jokingly) to get my coworkers to unionize
12:19 < Synx_hm> fuckers cant fire me for that
12:19 <@Corydon76> It would have severely restricted companies' ability to pay people salaries who weren't in management positions
12:20 <@Corydon76> In Tennessee, they can.  We're a right-to-work state
12:20 < Synx_hm> Corydon76, i tried to read through all the clauses of that, what i came out of it with was if you are in a IT field you can quite easily be shuffled around and classified so they dont have to pay overtime and can work you all hours of the day
12:20 <@Corydon76> You can technically file a complaint with NLRB, but given the current federal administration, that's not going to go far
12:21 < Synx_hm> wasn't there also some cap on salary where by if you got paid over that you automatically were disqd from the entire thing anyways
12:21 <@Corydon76> Yeah, something like $127k
12:21 < Synx_hm> Corydon76, huh? i thought federal labor laws restricted the termination of an employee for attempting to start a union
12:21 < Synx_hm> oh why did i think it was only like 70K
12:21 <@Corydon76> $70k is around where the grey zone starts
12:22 <@Corydon76> There's two different salary levels.  Below ~$70k you _always_ got overtime, above ~$127k you never got overtime
12:23 <@Corydon76> In between, it was means-tested by whether you managed at least 2 persons
12:23 <@Corydon76> If you manage people, you don't get overtime.  If you don't manage people, you get overtime
12:23 < Synx_hm> hrm
12:23 <@Corydon76> The limits before the Obama rule are much lower
12:23 < Synx_hm> but that never went into law?
12:24 <@Corydon76> It was a rule change, not a law
12:24 < Synx_hm> ahh
12:24 < Synx_hm> well that sure would have been helpful right about now
12:24 <@Corydon76> https://www.natlawreview.com/article/dol-announces-final-rule-salary-threshold-exempt-white-collar-employees
12:24 < PigBot> Couldn't snarf url: [Errno 1] _ssl.c:492: error:14077410:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:sslv3 alert handshake failure. http://tinyurl.com/y8rpzy2e
12:25 < Synx_hm> was it ever in effect, because i can go back and sue these fucks if it was
12:25 <@Corydon76> You probably still qualify.  Looks like the old upper limit (and now, current) is $100,000
12:26 <@Corydon76> So if you're still making 5 figures, and you don't manage 2 other people, then you qualify for overtime
12:27 < Synx_hm> wonder how bonuses play into that
12:28 < Synx_hm> where are those lawyers i can call up for free and get all the tools to tell my company to piss off ;)
12:29 <@Corydon76> Here's another document: https://www.dol.gov/whd/overtime/fs17a_overview.pdf
12:29 < PigBot> Corydon76: That URL appears to have no HTML title within the first 30480 bytes.
12:29 <@Corydon76> We may fall under the "Professional Exemption"
12:30 <@Corydon76> Or "Computer Employee Exemption"
12:30 < Synx_hm> i think thats what i was finding, something about some IT fields as a requirement of the profession for things like oncall status
12:31 <@Corydon76> Oh, and the lower limit was not $70k.  It was supposed to be raised from $23k to $47k
12:31 < Synx_hm> i guess i could simply email HR and ask how they classify my position acording to FLSA
12:50 <@Dagmar> Keep in mind that labor violations carry a triple penalty and the employer in violation has to pay the legal fees
12:52 < Drag0n`> keep in mind that HR is there to protect the company before the employee, so what ever the corporate lawyers say, is what they will say
12:52 < Drag0n`> might be better to call your state labor board for clarification
12:53 <@Dagmar> The TL;DR on that is "HR is your adversary"
13:23 -!- dc0de[m] [dc0dematri@gateway/shell/matrix.org/x-cymednvvxgfdvlso] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
13:29 -!- dc0de[m] [dc0dematri@gateway/shell/matrix.org/x-qcajhfeuxzukejmm] has joined #se2600
14:05 < Synx_hm> haha ya aint no way in hell i am actually going to self designate to HR ;)
14:07 < Synx_hm> a while back (they still do this to others not smart enough to say no) my company was trying to get me to sign legally binding VPN/NDA agreements with our customers so i could get access to their networks etc, i spoke with our corp counsel about it they said sure if you sign that its all on you, something happens you are personally liable and honestly we should not be asking you to sign that sort of shit
14:07 < Synx_hm> i used that as fire to say hell no i aint signing that shit and they got their panties all in a twist over it
14:26 <@Corydon76> Props for seeking cover before you put yourself in a compromising position
14:42 < dasunt> 202nd day of Trump's presidency, headline on CNN right now is how much of a warning Guam would get in event of a nuclear strike.
14:43 < dasunt> Good job everyone!
15:01 -!- dc0de[m] [dc0dematri@gateway/shell/matrix.org/x-qcajhfeuxzukejmm] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
15:04 -!- dc0de[m] [dc0dematri@gateway/shell/matrix.org/x-ykzlirvjxdengxpt] has joined #se2600
15:12 < Synx_hm> i have been getting questions about this all day
15:13 < Synx_hm> all of my deployments were to guam
15:13 < Synx_hm> specifically as part of continuous bomber presence, the thing were we keep bombers in constant rotation on guam as deterrence to nK in the pacific theater
15:14 < Synx_hm> nothing has changed, i flew quite a few many similar missions that the news has been reporting of the bones, its been normal ops for years
15:14 < xray> Synx_hm: I'm from Guam
15:14 < Synx_hm> there have been destabilizing situations throughout the course here
15:15 < Synx_hm> ha small world
15:15 < xray> yeah
15:15 < xray> I was alarmed to see the news about the NK threats
15:15 < xray> but what else is new
15:15 < Synx_hm> your cocanut crabs are fucking crazy, i think i got mange from a boonie dog, and ive never drank so much in my life as the weekend they put us up at the outrigger while the oncoming bomber unit was moving into anderson
15:16 < Synx_hm> anyways point is nothing is new, with one exception, we have an idiot at the helm
15:17 < Synx_hm> so long as he doesn't provoke nK to the point of attack all will be fine, however if everybody in seoul dies (and everybody will if conflict kicks off) its going blood solely in trumps hands
15:17 < xray> Unfortunately it's difficult for anyone to reason with a crazy person (NK)
15:17 < xray> If it gets kinetic SK will lose no matter who shoots first
15:18 < xray> which is sad
15:18 < xray> all my ops were on the east coast
15:18 < xray> north of the arctic circle
15:18 < dasunt> "reason with a crazy person"?  Which one?
15:19 < Synx_hm> ha, quite a large number of guamanian peoples join the mil eh
15:19 < dasunt> The one with the bad hair...?
15:19 < xray> NK is a speacial case of crazy
15:19 < Synx_hm> the one with the fat face
15:19 < dasunt> And Trump isn't?
15:19 < dasunt> Synx_hm: You mean the one who has relied on inherited wealth and influence for his power?
15:19 < Synx_hm> ha
15:20 < Synx_hm> ya that one
15:21 < xray> I haven't heard any discussion about cyber activism if NK goes all nuclear
15:21 < dasunt> If he wasn't surrounded by a bunch of ass-kissing sycophants, perhaps we could reason with him.
15:27 < Synx_hm> id prefer to see zero oplans executed, but much more so prefer to see zero usage of anything related to oplan 8010
15:30 -!- remoford1 [~remo_lapt@c-68-52-35-32.hsd1.tn.comcast.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
16:09 < aestetix> https://twitter.com/aestetix/status/896115281482752000
16:09 < PigBot> Title: aestetix on Twitter: "The news cycle has been so nuts that you probably missed the long-anticipated release of The Land Before Time XIV: https://t.co/IU78Li9AmL" (at twitter.com) http://tinyurl.com/y7rxnyt8
16:10 < K`Tetch> i saw you say that, littlefoot
16:48 -!- TheDukh [~thedukh@cpe-74-141-205-192.kya.res.rr.com] has quit []
16:55 -!- remoford1 [~remo_lapt@c-68-52-35-32.hsd1.tn.comcast.net] has joined #se2600
17:12 -!- cyberanger [~cyberange@swissknife/adak/infocop411] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
17:13 -!- cyberanger [~cyberange@swissknife/adak/infocop411] has joined #se2600
17:19 -!- strages [uid11297@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ubtqajolwegldaso] has joined #se2600
18:43 -!- cyberanger [~cyberange@swissknife/adak/infocop411] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
18:45 -!- cyberanger [~cyberange@swissknife/adak/infocop411] has joined #se2600
19:15 -!- NoFault [~NoFault@c-174-49-12-150.hsd1.tn.comcast.net] has joined #se2600
19:51 -!- Dolemite [~scott@96-38-109-185.dhcp.jcsn.tn.charter.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
19:52 -!- Dolemite [~scott@96-38-109-185.dhcp.jcsn.tn.charter.com] has joined #se2600
19:52 -!- mode/#se2600 [+o Dolemite] by ChanServ
20:11 -!- remoford1 [~remo_lapt@c-68-52-35-32.hsd1.tn.comcast.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
21:25 -!- NoFault [~NoFault@c-174-49-12-150.hsd1.tn.comcast.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
--- Log closed Sat Aug 12 00:00:24 2017